UMN Undergraduate Law Review
Home
Vol. 1, Issue 1
Our Staff
  • Executive Board
  • Staff Writers
Join Us
Blog
UMN Undergraduate Law Review
Home
Vol. 1, Issue 1
Our Staff
  • Executive Board
  • Staff Writers
Join Us
Blog
More
  • Home
  • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Our Staff
    • Executive Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Join Us
  • Blog
  • Home
  • Vol. 1, Issue 1
  • Our Staff
    • Executive Board
    • Staff Writers
  • Join Us
  • Blog

Blog

Plaintiff(s) v. Roblox

Incineration: An Invisible Killer

Incineration: An Invisible Killer

Derek Thao

Roblox is currently under fire for negligence to protect children. There have been numerous accusations and suits against Roblox Corporations failing to protect their amount of underaged users and plaintiffs commonly assert that Roblox owed a duty of care to its young users and/or parents to design, operate, moderate, and warn about the platform in a way that reasonably protects minors.

Read Now

Incineration: An Invisible Killer

Incineration: An Invisible Killer

Incineration: An Invisible Killer

Josephine Black

The climate crisis is known widely as an invisible issue. That is why it is so hard to shed light on the change that needs to happen. But what if I told you climate issues are impacting your health and becoming a personal ethics issue right under your nose within major cities. 

Read Now

Cycles of Intervention: The Geopolitical Consequences of U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East

Cycles of Intervention: The Geopolitical Consequences of U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East

Cycles of Intervention: The Geopolitical Consequences of U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East

Yasir Abdi

The chain reaction of occupation, retaliation, and intervention reshaped modern geopolitics, from the rise of Islamist movements to America’s unending War on Terror.

Read Now

Double Trouble? FinTech and the Expectation of Privacy

Cycles of Intervention: The Geopolitical Consequences of U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East

Cycles of Intervention: The Geopolitical Consequences of U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East

Sakiya Mohamed

The underlying principle of the right to privacy remains constant; individuals are entitled to control access to their personal information.

Read Now

Barrett v. US: Reevaluating the Double Jeopardy Clause

Cycles of Intervention: The Geopolitical Consequences of U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East

Blended Families, Blending Laws: The Legal Side of Blended Families

Kiran Sikka

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Barrett v. US in early October 2025. While the case has received limited media coverage, the decision could have various implications on the future of the 5th amendment’s Double Jeopardy clause. 

Read Now

Blended Families, Blending Laws: The Legal Side of Blended Families

Jimmy Kimmel and the First Amendment: What the Late-Night Host’s Recent Suspension Says About Freedo

Blended Families, Blending Laws: The Legal Side of Blended Families

Sydney Kenney

Blended families often face unique legal challenges that traditional family structures do not. From determining custody arrangements and establishing parental rights to addressing monetary concerns, understanding the legal implications of blending households is essential. 

Read Now

Power, Protest, and the Constitution: The Legal War Over Trump’s Troop Deployment to Illinois

Jimmy Kimmel and the First Amendment: What the Late-Night Host’s Recent Suspension Says About Freedo

Jimmy Kimmel and the First Amendment: What the Late-Night Host’s Recent Suspension Says About Freedo

Samira Mohamed

The president sending soldiers to a city without legal authority will drive a conflict from a political to a constitutional moment. Today, as federal troops line up outside Chicago, the courtroom – not the streets – has become the true battleground. With President Trump’s attempt to invoke the Insurrection Act and Illinois officials fighting back, the case raises a grave constitutional question: when does preserving order cross into defying democracy? 

Read Now

Jimmy Kimmel and the First Amendment: What the Late-Night Host’s Recent Suspension Says About Freedo

Jimmy Kimmel and the First Amendment: What the Late-Night Host’s Recent Suspension Says About Freedo

Jimmy Kimmel and the First Amendment: What the Late-Night Host’s Recent Suspension Says About Freedo

Logan Jakubowski

Jimmy Kimmel was recently suspended by ABC, with some claiming the reason was due to comments made by FCC Chair Brendan Carr. Here is what the FCC actually has the authority to do.  

Read Now

Who Controls the Fed? President Trump’s Challenge to Central Bank Independence

The Termination of TPS for Venezuelans and the Trump Administration's Exploitation of the Emergency

The Termination of TPS for Venezuelans and the Trump Administration's Exploitation of the Emergency

Olivia Long

Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook is facing an unprecedented attempt at removal from her position on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors by President Trump. The lower courts have ruled to pause her removal pending the Supreme Court ruling. The outcome could reexamine judicial precedent on executive power and have lasting implications for the U.S. economy.  

Read Now

The Termination of TPS for Venezuelans and the Trump Administration's Exploitation of the Emergency

The Termination of TPS for Venezuelans and the Trump Administration's Exploitation of the Emergency

The Termination of TPS for Venezuelans and the Trump Administration's Exploitation of the Emergency

Sophia Pavek

The Trump administration ended TPS for Venezuelans through the use of the emergency docket, allowing the Supreme Court to block ongoing litigation in lower courts. This overreach of executive power raises alarming concerns about the corruption of the courts by way of partisan interests and its serious humanitarian implications.  

Read Now

The Slaughter-ing of Bipartisanship: Legal Battles Over FTC Firings

The Termination of TPS for Venezuelans and the Trump Administration's Exploitation of the Emergency

What is “Patriotic Education”, and Why is the Trump Administration Pushing It in Public Schools?

Mia Werden

The Trump administration’s controversial removal of Democratic Federal Trade Commissioners challenges longstanding legal protections and raises questions about the future of regulatory independence and the balance of power in bipartisan commissions.

Read Now

What is “Patriotic Education”, and Why is the Trump Administration Pushing It in Public Schools?

What is “Patriotic Education”, and Why is the Trump Administration Pushing It in Public Schools?

What is “Patriotic Education”, and Why is the Trump Administration Pushing It in Public Schools?

Kat Jensen

The Trump administration would like you to view public school teachers as evil harbingers of radical ideology, teaching kids to hate the United States. The irony of this claim becomes especially apparent when you read the part of the executive order that unveils the administration’s new goals for public K-12 education: “patriotic education” and teaching “American political tradition.”

Read Now

Congress vs. Coins: The Cost of a Government Shutdown

What is “Patriotic Education”, and Why is the Trump Administration Pushing It in Public Schools?

Lawyers and Morality: Debates on Liability and Ethical Responsibility

Zeina Hussein

As Congress debates budgets, everyday Americans suffer the rippling repercussions. Millions of citizens have found themselves caught in the middle of the crossfire, as Congress fails to address the government shut down. This shutdown has already carried out many effects on middle class Americans, who continuously get more nervous as a resolution seems to be far from today’s reality.

Read Now

Lawyers and Morality: Debates on Liability and Ethical Responsibility

What is “Patriotic Education”, and Why is the Trump Administration Pushing It in Public Schools?

Lawyers and Morality: Debates on Liability and Ethical Responsibility

Addie Manthey

If a lawyer defends a murder case knowing the person is guilty, how much moral liability is placed on the lawyer? Should the lawyer accept some ethical responsibility for the conclusion of the case, or should the blame be placed on the system that caused this person to get off scot-free?

Read Now

Fair Use and AI Accountability

Ruling In The Dark: How Executive Action Feeds The Shadow Docket Cycle

The PRO Act: Strengthening Unions or Harming the Economy?

Alessia Rossi

In the process of training AI, the intellectual property of thousands of copyright holders may be violated. As developers and copyright holders seek to assert their rights, fair use dominates legal analysis. 

Read Now

The PRO Act: Strengthening Unions or Harming the Economy?

Ruling In The Dark: How Executive Action Feeds The Shadow Docket Cycle

The PRO Act: Strengthening Unions or Harming the Economy?

Anousha Mozammel

Unionization has been a long contested topic in history. Used internationally, unions have been seen as a way to strengthen workers’ rights, improve the workplace environment, and raise the minimum wage. While improving workers rights is a generally supported issue by the public, there are economic balances and supply chain squeeze effects that go unseen. The PRO Act is a currently debated piece of legislation that could effectively increase the strength of unions. 

Read Now

Ruling In The Dark: How Executive Action Feeds The Shadow Docket Cycle

Ruling In The Dark: How Executive Action Feeds The Shadow Docket Cycle

Every Fingerprint is Unique, But That Doesn’t Mean It’s Private: Biometric Privacy Laws and Why We S

Antoine Eggers

When the President issues sweeping executive orders, the Supreme Court often responds with lightning-fast shadow docket rulings. But speed comes at a cost: judges, agencies, and ordinary citizens are left unsure what the law actually requires. 

Read Now

Every Fingerprint is Unique, But That Doesn’t Mean It’s Private: Biometric Privacy Laws and Why We S

Every Fingerprint is Unique, But That Doesn’t Mean It’s Private: Biometric Privacy Laws and Why We S

Every Fingerprint is Unique, But That Doesn’t Mean It’s Private: Biometric Privacy Laws and Why We S

Sophia Tutt

In an era of AI, deepfakes, and social media, nothing about a person is private anymore. With large areas of uncertainty and a lack of federal regulation, many states have stepped in to attempt to preserve this integral aspect of your personal data.

Read Now

Preaching from the Chair

Every Fingerprint is Unique, But That Doesn’t Mean It’s Private: Biometric Privacy Laws and Why We S

Profiting from the Icebox: The Dilemma Behind the Reversal of Private Prison Ban and ICE

Zayan Hasan

The Supreme Court’s pending decision in Chiles v. Salazar could reverse decades of work toward protecting at-risk LGBTQ+ minors and strike down laws on conversion therapy in over twenty states

Read Now

Profiting from the Icebox: The Dilemma Behind the Reversal of Private Prison Ban and ICE

Every Fingerprint is Unique, But That Doesn’t Mean It’s Private: Biometric Privacy Laws and Why We S

Profiting from the Icebox: The Dilemma Behind the Reversal of Private Prison Ban and ICE

Duyen Nguyen

At the start of the new Trump administration, a reversal of private prison contracts previously established by Biden were put in place. How does the reversal interfere with current ICE practices and detention centers?

Read Now

Sackler Family of Purdue Pharma Slammed in Latest Settlement

Sackler Family of Purdue Pharma Slammed in Latest Settlement

Sackler Family of Purdue Pharma Slammed in Latest Settlement

Daniel Eckers

American society has been ravaged by the Opioid epidemic, but a recent settlement targets Purdue Pharma, a major proponent of the crisis. The opioid settlement will distribute billions to affected communities and provide a footing for future legal action.

Read Now

Palantir Concerns and Invasion of Privacy Through AI

Sackler Family of Purdue Pharma Slammed in Latest Settlement

Sackler Family of Purdue Pharma Slammed in Latest Settlement

Joshua Yang

The Trump administration has allowed the usage of Palantir’s AI systems to utilize personal data to police individuals. What does this entail for our rights to privacy?

Read Now

A Call for Reform: The 13th Amendment’s Slavery Loophole

Sackler Family of Purdue Pharma Slammed in Latest Settlement

Incarcerated Firefighters Illuminate How Slavery Persists by Law

Elena Kesselring

The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution is celebrated as the legal change that abolished slavery. Many people do not know the dark underbelly of this amendment–legal enslavement of incarcerated people. Addressing this loophole requires both legislative and policy reforms to ensure that the foundational promise of abolition is fully ensured.

Read Now

Incarcerated Firefighters Illuminate How Slavery Persists by Law

Judges, Presidents, and Planes: A Story of Judicial Review in Modern Day Politics

Incarcerated Firefighters Illuminate How Slavery Persists by Law

Eva Schutz

Slavery is back on the ballot in California amidst stories of labor exploitation among incarcerated individuals fighting against the L.A. wildfires.

Read Now

Judges, Presidents, and Planes: A Story of Judicial Review in Modern Day Politics

Judges, Presidents, and Planes: A Story of Judicial Review in Modern Day Politics

Judges, Presidents, and Planes: A Story of Judicial Review in Modern Day Politics

Sophia Tutt

C-SPAN isn’t the only channel covering Court news, now it’s every news outlet along with multiple live streams across social media sites. Suddenly judges’ decisions are in the limelight. It may seem confusing to many people. Why on earth would an unelected official get to make decisions–whose authority are they under? Why are those decisions followed? Most pressingly, perhaps, what happens if they aren’t?

Read Now

Legal Responsibility in College Sports

Judges, Presidents, and Planes: A Story of Judicial Review in Modern Day Politics

Judges, Presidents, and Planes: A Story of Judicial Review in Modern Day Politics

Alexandra Geist

There is a growing awareness of the long-term health consequences for collegiate athletes who are at risk of and sustain these sport-related injuries. It is crucial for institutions to improve compliance with safety protocols, provide comprehensive education, and ensure that adequate care is available to athletes, both during and after their participation in high-contact sports.

Read Now

The Wall is Coming Down: Religious Liberty Cases are Eroding the Separation of Church and State in t

The Wall is Coming Down: Religious Liberty Cases are Eroding the Separation of Church and State in t

The Wall is Coming Down: Religious Liberty Cases are Eroding the Separation of Church and State in t

 Sophia Tutt 

With the separation of church and state on the line, the Supreme Court takes on three new cases in the 2024 term.

Read Now

The Intersection of Medical Malpractice Laws and First Amendment Rights

The Wall is Coming Down: Religious Liberty Cases are Eroding the Separation of Church and State in t

The Wall is Coming Down: Religious Liberty Cases are Eroding the Separation of Church and State in t

 Alexandra Geist 

The intersection of medical malpractice law and religious freedom presents a complex legal challenge, especially when standards conflict. Courts must carefully balance individual rights to religious freedom with the state's duty to protect public health and patient well-being; however, patients are often left with little help for legal recourse when it comes to violated norms.

Read Now

George Stinney & the Reinstatement of Capital Punishment

The Wall is Coming Down: Religious Liberty Cases are Eroding the Separation of Church and State in t

George Stinney & the Reinstatement of Capital Punishment

 Addie Manthey 

With the reinstatement of the death penalty, comes a need to reflect on why it was removed in the first place.

Read Now

Sentenced Before Senior Prom

George Stinney & the Reinstatement of Capital Punishment

 Amelia Eric 

It's imperative to question the justice of subjecting children to a system designed for adult offenders. Rehabilitation, not punishment, should be the focus. Adolescence is a period of heightened vulnerability, and this vulnerability is magnified when mental health issues are present. How can we justify placing children in a punitive system when they lack the full capacity to comprehend the consequences of their actions?​

Read Now

I Dissent - How Being in the Minority Opinion Can Introduce Social Change

 Sophia Tutt 

Dissenting opinions have been an avenue of change for many years. There is more than one way to create change, and being in the minority is one of them. The Lily Ledbetter Act of 2009 shows us exactly that, and reminds us why fighting for what’s right doesn’t always stop when you lose.

Read Now

Loper Bright, The Federal Trade Commission, and the Future of Federal Regulatory Agencies

 Alex Kizer 

The FTC’s regulations effectively ban all non-compete agreements except for senior executives. This move that would foster competition in the labor market and provide an end to the restrictive non-compete clauses employers often use but sparked a legal debate over the extent of federal regulatory power.

Read Now

The Implications of Revoking Lyndon B. Johnson’s 1965 Anti-Segregation Executive Order

The Implications of Revoking Lyndon B. Johnson’s 1965 Anti-Segregation Executive Order

 Eva Schutz 

The Trump administration has decided to annul Lyndon B. Johnson's 1965 executive order, leaving citizens, activists, and federal contractors alike to question what the future holds for civil liberties and segregation.

Read Now

Biden v. Nebraska: The Balance between Executive Power and Student Debt Relief

The Implications of Revoking Lyndon B. Johnson’s 1965 Anti-Segregation Executive Order

 Bayleigh Bergner 

While the Court’s decision to block the Biden administration’s debt relief plan limits executive power, it also highlights the urgent need for Congress to act on the student debt crisis.

Read Now

When Words Become Crimes: The End of the “True Threat Test” and Implications of Free Speech

 Alex Kizer 

What constitutes a threat? How far should free speech go? The Supreme Court's dismantling of the “true threat” test affects victims, expression, and the future of First Amendment protections.

Read Now

Apple Might Owe You Money: Class Actions & Why They Matter

Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition: The President's Power Over Foreign Aid

 Sophia Tutt 

Class action lawsuits aren’t just money grabs from law firms, or even by consumers. They are an important avenue for getting justice for large groups of people about a variety of issues. Class actions have required new food regulations, limited tobacco use, and ensured privacy rights.

Read Now

Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition: The President's Power Over Foreign Aid

Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition: The President's Power Over Foreign Aid

Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition: The President's Power Over Foreign Aid

 Alex Kizer 

From a nonpartisan standpoint, this landmark case makes clear that if Congress has appropriated funds to a federal agency, the executive branch in charge must faithfully execute that funding. Although arguments can be made surrounding the President's true power in shutting down certain funding and agencies within its discretion through its constitutional powers, both the judicial and legislative branches have consistently rejected such claims.

Read Now

Why You Can’t Colonize the Cosmos: Space Law

Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition: The President's Power Over Foreign Aid

Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition: The President's Power Over Foreign Aid

 Eva Schutz 

Recently, a seemingly pointless 11 minute rocket flight taught many of us that the edge of the atmosphere is a closer ride than a drive to the local grocery store, leaving the world even more perplexed about how outer space works. But don’t worry, there is an entire legal field dedicated to answering that exact question.

Read Now

Corporate Accountability and Human Rights

The Dismantling of Department of Education: A Constitutional and Legal Analysis of Trump’s Executive

The Dismantling of Department of Education: A Constitutional and Legal Analysis of Trump’s Executive

 Bayleigh Bergner 

The discussion on whether international human rights laws should apply to corporations the same way they do to countries. The United Nations introduced the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) in 2011 to protect human rights.

Read Now

The Dismantling of Department of Education: A Constitutional and Legal Analysis of Trump’s Executive

The Dismantling of Department of Education: A Constitutional and Legal Analysis of Trump’s Executive

The Dismantling of Department of Education: A Constitutional and Legal Analysis of Trump’s Executive

 Anaam Awad 

While Trump and his supporters present the dismantling of the Department of Education as a restoration of states' rights and parental authority, its consequences threaten to unravel decades of progress in public education, civil rights enforcement, and constitutional protection.

Read Now

State of Minnesota v. Bee

The Dismantling of Department of Education: A Constitutional and Legal Analysis of Trump’s Executive

The Role of Social Media in Shaping Legal Reform

 Abby Dalchow 

What is a public place as defined by the law?

Read Now

The Role of Social Media in Shaping Legal Reform

Pay to Stay: Inequality in the Incarceration of The Rich vs. Everyone Else

The Role of Social Media in Shaping Legal Reform

 Bayleigh Bergner 

While social media has driven many positive changes, there are occasions when it can interfere or cross the line, potentially causing more harm than good in legal cases. Social media’s ability to shape public opinion can be both beneficial and harmful. In high-profile cases, public opinion often forms quickly and firmly, even if it is without a full understanding of the legal facts or process.

Read Now

Pay to Stay: Inequality in the Incarceration of The Rich vs. Everyone Else

Pay to Stay: Inequality in the Incarceration of The Rich vs. Everyone Else

Pay to Stay: Inequality in the Incarceration of The Rich vs. Everyone Else

 Addie Manthey  

The option to pay for higher quality living while incarcerated creates a class system within prison. This can cause unfair treatment of those incarcerated and further the narrative and being that the judicial system is unfair.

Read Now

Till Debt… Do We Part?

Pay to Stay: Inequality in the Incarceration of The Rich vs. Everyone Else

Pay to Stay: Inequality in the Incarceration of The Rich vs. Everyone Else

Amelia Eric

Alimony is no longer just about keeping women safe anymore – it can be awarded to either side depending on the specific facts of the marriage, the finances, and the roles each side took in the marriage.

Read Now

The Legal Protections and Risks of Health Privacy in Wearable Technology

Legal Implications of ICE Raids on College Campuses: Rights You Have as a Student

Legal Implications of ICE Raids on College Campuses: Rights You Have as a Student

Alexandra Geist

The ethical concerns surrounding wearable technology, such as users being unaware of how their data is used or shared, highlights the importance of stronger regulations. The challenges in enforcing privacy laws across different jurisdictions create significant gaps in privacy protection.

Read Now

Legal Implications of ICE Raids on College Campuses: Rights You Have as a Student

Legal Implications of ICE Raids on College Campuses: Rights You Have as a Student

Legal Implications of ICE Raids on College Campuses: Rights You Have as a Student

Elena Kesselring

Exploring the unique protections given by being a student during violent ICE crackdowns

Read Now

Winning the “Hearts and Minds” Through Civil Disobedience

Legal Implications of ICE Raids on College Campuses: Rights You Have as a Student

Neuralink and the Call for Stronger Bioethical Regulations

Jacob Hong

Exploring the role of breaking the law in making the law.

Read Now

Neuralink and the Call for Stronger Bioethical Regulations

Looking to the Future: the implications of Title IX and DEI rollbacks

Neuralink and the Call for Stronger Bioethical Regulations

Dawit Gebremaryam

Elon Musk and his neurotechnology company have created a computer that functions as a brain which has led to the death of a primate and the questioning of the company over violations related to hazardous materials, animal welfare, and conflicts of interest in scientific oversight.

Read Now

Looking to the Future: the implications of Title IX and DEI rollbacks

Looking to the Future: the implications of Title IX and DEI rollbacks

Looking to the Future: the implications of Title IX and DEI rollbacks

Eva Schutz

The Trump administration is actively working on dismantling DEI programs and language across the country. Here is how Title IX and other sex-and race-based laws are facing scrutiny and possible overturn.

Read Now

The Future of Religious Charter Schools

Looking to the Future: the implications of Title IX and DEI rollbacks

Looking to the Future: the implications of Title IX and DEI rollbacks

Alex Kizer

Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. Drummond

How a First Amendment challenge could be used to create a first of its kind religious-based charter school. Its effects and implications on public education may reshape the boundaries of church-state separation in public education and in public funds.

Read Now


  • Join Us

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept